2025 Mazda CX-90: Fuel Economy and Range (MHEV vs PHEV)
Explore the 2025 Mazda CX-90’s fuel consumption and driving range, comparing MHEV and PHEV versions
October 03 2025,
The 2025 Mazda CX-90 is available in MHEV and PHEV versions. Compare fuel consumption, electric-only range (42 km for PHEV), and benefits of each powertrain for Canadian drivers.
2025 Mazda CX-90: Fuel Economy and Range (MHEV vs PHEV)
Complete comparison of MHEV (mild hybrid 48V) and PHEV (plug-in hybrid) versions of the 2025 Mazda CX-90 — fuel economy, EV range, towing capacity, and practical buying advice for drivers in Canada.
Quick Overview
- MHEV (48V mild hybrid): 3.3 e-SKYACTIV-G inline-6 engine with 48V assist, combined fuel economy ≈ 9.3–9.5 L/100 km, towing up to 2,268 kg (5,000 lb) with towing package.
- PHEV (plug-in hybrid): 2.5L gas engine + electric motor, ~17.8 kWh battery, EV range ≈ 42 km, combined economy ≈ 4.2 Le/100 km, total range ≈ 798 km, towing up to 1,588 kg (3,500 lb).
Detailed Comparison — MHEV vs PHEV
| Criteria | MHEV (Mild Hybrid) | PHEV (Plug-in Hybrid) |
|---|---|---|
| Main engine | 3.3 e-SKYACTIV-G inline-6 + 48V assist. Power depends on trim (280–340 hp). | Gas engine + electric motor, system output ≈319–323 hp. 17.8 kWh battery. |
| Electric motor | Small support motor (~17 hp), 48V battery (0.33 kWh). | Powerful e-motors (up to 173 hp), 17.8 kWh battery for full EV driving. |
| Fuel economy (combined) | ≈ 9.3–9.5 L/100 km depending on trim. | ≈ 4.2 Le/100 km combined (with charging). Gas-only ≈ 9.4 L/100 km. |
| EV range | — (no significant EV driving, mild hybrid only). | ≈ 42 km all-electric. Level 2 recharge: ~1.3 h (20→80%). |
| Total range | Based on ~70–74 L tank and 9.3 L/100 km avg. | ≈ 798 km combined (battery + gas). |
| Towing | Standard: 1,588 kg (3,500 lb). With towing pkg: 2,268 kg (5,000 lb). | Up to 1,588 kg (3,500 lb) depending on trim. |
| Best for | Long-distance driving, frequent towing, simple use, lower purchase price. | Short daily commutes with home/work charging — major fuel savings. |
Practical Takeaways for Drivers
- Short commutes + charging access: The PHEV shines with ~42 km EV range, cutting gas use dramatically.
- Long-distance trips + towing often: The MHEV is simpler, more robust, and offers towing up to 5,000 lb with package.
- Cost difference: PHEV comes at a higher purchase price but saves on fuel if charged regularly. MHEV is more affordable and mechanically simpler.
Verdict & Rating
— The 2025 Mazda CX-90 delivers an excellent balance of performance, versatility, and efficiency. PHEV is ideal for eco-conscious urban drivers with charging access, while MHEV is the best pick for towing and long trips.
FAQ — Common Questions (SEO)
What is the EV range of the CX-90 PHEV?≈ 42 km all-electric under official mixed cycle testing.Which version is more fuel efficient?The PHEV is more efficient overall (≈ 4.2 Le/100 km) if charged regularly. The MHEV averages ≈9.3–9.5 L/100 km.How much can the CX-90 tow?MHEV: up to 5,000 lb with towing package. PHEV: up to 3,500 lb depending on trim.Which is better for Canada?If you have charging access and commute mostly in the city, go PHEV. If you tow, take long highway trips, or have limited charging access, the MHEV is more practical.
Note: All figures (fuel economy, range, towing) are based on official Mazda Canada specifications for 2025 CX-90 MHEV & PHEV. Real-world results may vary depending on conditions.
